kathyfenzly 0 Report post Posted March 8, 2007 hi sy baru kat cni....sy dah baca post2 sebelum ni pasal topic mcm....tp still tak puas hati....boleh tlg sy buat kputusan?antara AMD Turion 64 2GHZ dgn INTEL core SOLO 1.86 GHZ untuk LAPTOP?Ade org kate AMD ni panas la...AMD ni bleh gune 4-5 application dlm 1 mase la....AMD laju laade org kate INTEL pun ok....tapi sy still confius la....sy ni bkn la gune untuk game...sy nak gune tuk programming,multimedia....etcbyk gak software kene install....so camner ek?ape kelebihan dan kekurangan AMD TURION 64 2GHZ dgn INTEL CORE SOLO 1.86 GHZ?? Harga exactly same......spec sume same........cume processor je lain...someone please help Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RevolutionWorks 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2007 Cuba check website ni:Toms Hardware Interactive Mobile CPU chartsSetakat ni, rasanya Intel ada edge sikit berbanding AMD. Kalau utk multimedia, saya recommend Intel, sebab Intel memang baik dalam multimedia program (Photoshop, Video decoding, etc). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Balthazor 1 Report post Posted March 9, 2007 ape kelebihan dan kekurangan AMD TURION 64 2GHZ dgn INTEL CORE SOLO 1.86 GHZ?? Harga exactly same......spec sume same........cume processor je lain...someone please helpaku refer ko amik AMD....aku dah jual banyak .....sekolah amik dari aku......kilang ngan office biasa pun amik dari aku........kalo setakat nak running photoshop Cs2 x payah bimbang......Intel Core Solo 1.86GHZ tu lebih pada bateri je tapi performance hancuss.....siap lebur skali.......... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lanuncyber 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2007 go for AMD. dalam graphic rendering dan multimedia, AMD lebih baik daripada Intel...... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ikan_semilang 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2007 AMD panas? Aku pakai ok jek..aku pakai Turion64 ML-32 1.8Ghz selamba jek untuk Photoshop CS, Illustrator cuma wat video render jek pakai desktop. Desktop pun pakai AMD tapi Dual Core ler... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RevolutionWorks 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2007 Intel's Core processor family is rather dominant, and clearly offers better performance than the Turion 64 X2 family. If performance is what you're looking for, AMD's Turion 64 X2 is hardly an alternative. However, performance depends very much on a mobile computer's particular configuration: memory size and speed, hard drive spindle speed and the graphics subsystem (discrete vs. shared graphics) have quite an impact on the result. Last but not least, keep processor performance in perspective: weight and battery runtime may be even more important to you anyway. In the end, we consider it very important to compare complete notebooks (and their costs) rather than focusing on CPU performance too much.Taken from:Toms HardwareHarap ia dapat membantu anda. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smile4me 1 Report post Posted March 9, 2007 dr tajuk tu...aku rekemenkan amik AMD Turion tu..lgpun turion dah ade extension 64bit.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Balthazor 1 Report post Posted March 9, 2007 dr tajuk tu...aku rekemenkan amik AMD Turion tu..lgpun turion dah ade extension 64bit..kalo x silap aku yg AMD Turion tu kebanyakan pakai ngan chipset ATiXPRESS200 kan?........kalo nak compare Core Solo tu pakai Intel chipset......?..........P:S kedua2 model support Shader Model 3.0 ke?............ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smile4me 1 Report post Posted March 9, 2007 (edited) kalo x silap aku yg AMD Turion tu kebanyakan pakai ngan chipset ATiXPRESS200 kan?........kalo nak compare Core Solo tu pakai Intel chipset......?..........P:S kedua2 model support Shader Model 3.0 ke?............ATI xpress200 support 2.0 jer...intel chipset for core solo pun samer.. Edited March 9, 2007 by smile4me Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sarge 1 Report post Posted March 9, 2007 kalau ade bajet, baik beli yg dual core terus Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WanR 0 Report post Posted March 9, 2007 intel bagus amik core2 duo, kalau bawah pada tu, baik amik amd turion / turion x2... dan dia tanya antara core solo ngan turion64, jwp aku ialah semestinya turion 64, yg chart tomshardware buat tu, utk high end, turion x2/core2 duo... nak refer buat pa kat situ.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
roronoazoro 1 Report post Posted March 10, 2007 sy nak gune tuk programming,multimedia....etcbg aku AMD sesuai utk graphic n keje2 yg ko nk buat..AMD mana ad panas.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smile4me 1 Report post Posted March 10, 2007 bg aku AMD sesuai utk graphic n keje2 yg ko nk buat..AMD mana ad panas.. antara amd turion vs core solo mmg sesuai amik amd turion..tp klu vs dgn core 2 duo,core 2 duo more better...sesuai jer untuk wat keje multimedia..lgpun dah ade 3DNow! technology dlm processor tu..walaupun cache nye x sebesar core solo,tp performance nyer more better than core solo..tunggu la smp cache untuk amd turion X2 mcm cache dlm core 2 duo processor..superb! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gengstapo 0 Report post Posted March 10, 2007 bg aku AMD sesuai utk graphic n keje2 yg ko nk buat..AMD mana ad panas.. zaman dedulu nyer la k0t AMD panasskang nie dah ada Cn'Q, tak panas dah AMD nieh Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ipos 0 Report post Posted March 10, 2007 aku bagi analogi senang jer...ntuk laptop atau notebook better to use Intel rather than AMD coz mmg Turion lebih cpat panas dari Intel.. then bile panas mule la slow... abistu meletup... hehebut for desktop or pc better use AMD than Intel because of it best performance, cheap and reliable... thats all Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smile4me 1 Report post Posted March 10, 2007 aku bagi analogi senang jer...ntuk laptop atau notebook better to use Intel rather than AMD coz mmg Turion lebih cpat panas dari Intel.. then bile panas mule la slow... abistu meletup... hehebut for desktop or pc better use AMD than Intel because of it best performance, cheap and reliable... thats allsetakat nih membe aku gune turion ok jer...klu bajet x byk,go for turion..klu duit lebih,amik la intel core 2 duo...klu nk penjimatan bateri,amik intel based on centrino...klu nk performance go for turion..turion more better than core solo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Balthazor 1 Report post Posted March 10, 2007 setakat nih membe aku gune turion ok jer...klu bajet x byk,go for turion..klu duit lebih,amik la intel core 2 duo...klu nk penjimatan bateri,amik intel based on centrino...klu nk performance go for turion..turion more better than core solo mesti....... aku pun jual banyak.....eh kalo x silap version AMD Turion tu based on proc apa ha? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
smile4me 1 Report post Posted March 10, 2007 mesti....... aku pun jual banyak.....eh kalo x silap version AMD Turion tu based on proc apa ha?AMD turion tu processor lar based on mobo ATI Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gengstapo 0 Report post Posted March 11, 2007 mesti....... aku pun jual banyak.....eh kalo x silap version AMD Turion tu based on proc apa ha?processor lappy lerr, socket 754 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rentung 0 Report post Posted March 12, 2007 aku bagi analogi senang jer...ntuk laptop atau notebook better to use Intel rather than AMD coz mmg Turion lebih cpat panas dari Intel.. then bile panas mule la slow... abistu meletup... hehebut for desktop or pc better use AMD than Intel because of it best performance, cheap and reliable... thats allpakai la notebook cooler kalo tak nak panas Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
F@TENWHOSEKNOW 0 Report post Posted March 12, 2007 amd turion better..kalo nak intel amik c2d okeh..tapi kalo aku..buruk amd pun takkira..musti mau amd gak.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
