asdasd 9 Report post Posted November 5, 2008 salam,klu nak citer pasal i7 elok la bukak thread baru nnt ganggu pulak konsentrasi TS. buat masa ni mungkin tak berbaloi nak beli i7 sbb terpaksa tukar satu platform terus..sedangkan c2q pon tak leh nak utilize sepenuhnya ni kan pulak i7. tp kalu duit dh byk tak tau nak buat apa tu tak kisah la kan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hampeh 21 Report post Posted November 5, 2008 hehe TS tengah pening mana nak pilih , e8400 atau q6600 . . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
X - Cellerator 0 Report post Posted November 6, 2008 apa da TS...go for Quad le...future proof lol...tgk requirement GTA 4 udah ler...32 & 22 nm x lama dah nih..cuns...anyway ak menabung mode...hehe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haziqnet 3 Report post Posted November 6, 2008 bape budget ko huhuhu???? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Superbandung 2 Report post Posted November 6, 2008 QUOTE(asdasd @ Nov 5 2008, 11:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>salam,klu nak citer pasal i7 elok la bukak thread baru nnt ganggu pulak konsentrasi TS. buat masa ni mungkin tak berbaloi nak beli i7 sbb terpaksa tukar satu platform terus..sedangkan c2q pon tak leh nak utilize sepenuhnya ni kan pulak i7. tp kalu duit dh byk tak tau nak buat apa tu tak kisah la kan. Tak pe..tak kisah pun kalau lari sikit..mana pun bagi pendapat kat thread Proc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Superbandung 2 Report post Posted November 6, 2008 Sengit2 E8400 dan Q9450 terbanyak..ada lagi 2 hari sebelum Thread in ditutup Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ajibs 0 Report post Posted November 6, 2008 go for Q9450 la bro.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fen-D 0 Report post Posted November 6, 2008 quad core untuk masa depan...hehe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diamondclow 0 Report post Posted November 6, 2008 go for quad kalau ko rasa nak stay ngan proc ni atleast 2 tahun...kalau amik E8400 rugi plak rasanya kalau x OC (walaupun OC sket, atleast 3.6GHz) kebanyakkan bench pon mengatakan E8400 ni berbaloi bila OC je... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mon678 48 Report post Posted November 7, 2008 amik q6600 mcm diamondclaw....walaupun aku vote for e8400 tapi better amik q6600....q6600 pun blh OC kaw2... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Superbandung 2 Report post Posted November 7, 2008 QUOTE(mon678 @ Nov 7 2008, 09:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>amik q6600 mcm diamondclaw....walaupun aku vote for e8400 tapi better amik q6600....q6600 pun blh OC kaw2...dari aku ambil Q6600 baik ambil Q9400 je..beza 2mb Cache je 1333 FSB vs 1066 VS 45nm VS 65nm.VS 2.66ghz vs 2.4ghzmacam mana kadang aku terfikir rugi kalau aku ambil Q9450 baik aku jimat RM150.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hampeh 21 Report post Posted November 7, 2008 bandung ko bli je ikut apa hati ko rasa sekarang pasal nanti bila harga turun lagi lagi sekali ko pening mana nak pilih:D . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Superbandung 2 Report post Posted November 7, 2008 (edited) Q9400 vs Q6600 sape menang??AKu tak leh tunggu lama2 tak sabar nak dapat KUAT TERAS niLast Question Edited November 7, 2008 by Superbandung Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hampeh 21 Report post Posted November 7, 2008 q9400 , pasal nombor dia lagi tinggi XD XD . Kalau dah beli nanti jangan lupa post kat thread "apa korang beli barang komputer baru hari ni " Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hiruka 4 Report post Posted November 8, 2008 Q9400 la bro..Q6600 tak salah aku 65nm Tech lagi..Go for 45nm Tech la atleast..More power efficiency..Quaddy panas tauu.. hehehe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Superbandung 2 Report post Posted November 8, 2008 (edited) QUOTE(hampeh @ Nov 7 2008, 09:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>q9400 , pasal nombor dia lagi tinggi XD XD . Kalau dah beli nanti jangan lupa post kat thread "apa korang beli barang komputer baru hari ni " Thank 4 info,aku rasa dah fikir abis..Q9400 aku akan angkat..OEM dari AllnGap RM590 icnclude postaga jimat RM160 dari Q9450..thank kerana undi dan berkongsi maklumat.ikutkan nafsu Q9450 dan Q9550 tapi sayang pulak duit.. Edited November 8, 2008 by Superbandung Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zer0Nehza 7 Report post Posted November 8, 2008 (edited) Alahai TS dari 9450 ubah ke 9400 pulak?9400 tu cut version 9450, crap less 6MB L2 cachetapi kalau fikirkan speed, yes untuk gaming. sudah berbaloi.tapi pakai quad bukan gaming semata-mata kan..QUADY 9 series tak berbaloi bagi aku klo cache 6MB Q6600 ada 8MB, Q6600 push ke 3.6ghz jauh lagi laju dari 9400, beat kaw2 tak perlu tengok FSB 1333 tu.. oc je Q6600, senang2 cecah 1800 .. heheq9400 = 6mb of cache, q6600 = 8mb, 9450 = 12mbdan diingatkan jangan pakai stok cooler klo quad ni.. panas.. dekat 70.. suhu bilik pon meningkat..aku nasihatkan TS amik 9450, kalau 9400 vs q6600, baik amik q6600. walaupon 9400 diakatakan new tech, 45nm, power efficiency, tengok dari segi cutdown version dia, FSB dia dah set tinggi, ratio rendah, vcore dia tak leh compare serendah vcore Q6600 boleh oc.9400 = tak higher ocing...video editing dengan quad memang mantap, 12MB memang pujaan, 8MB pon aku still leh encode + main game aku pon nak upgrade jugak ke Q9550, kumpul dana dulu, sementara i7 kuar... mesti Q9550 drop price .. go TS 9450.. jangan 9400... nanti menyesal... hahaha..p/s : apa guna vote kat atas tu, last2 ikut naluri sendiri plak Edited November 8, 2008 by zer0Nehza Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hampeh 21 Report post Posted November 8, 2008 tu la . huhuhu , good luck TS dah beli jangan lupa post gambar . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Superbandung 2 Report post Posted November 8, 2008 QUOTE(zer0Nehza @ Nov 8 2008, 04:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Alahai TS dari 9450 ubah ke 9400 pulak?9400 tu cut version 9450, crap less 6MB L2 cachetapi kalau fikirkan speed, yes untuk gaming. sudah berbaloi.tapi pakai quad bukan gaming semata-mata kan..QUADY 9 series tak berbaloi bagi aku klo cache 6MB Q6600 ada 8MB, Q6600 push ke 3.6ghz jauh lagi laju dari 9400, beat kaw2 tak perlu tengok FSB 1333 tu.. oc je Q6600, senang2 cecah 1800 .. heheq9400 = 6mb of cache, q6600 = 8mb, 9450 = 12mbdan diingatkan jangan pakai stok cooler klo quad ni.. panas.. dekat 70.. suhu bilik pon meningkat..aku nasihatkan TS amik 9450, kalau 9400 vs q6600, baik amik q6600. walaupon 9400 diakatakan new tech, 45nm, power efficiency, tengok dari segi cutdown version dia, FSB dia dah set tinggi, ratio rendah, vcore dia tak leh compare serendah vcore Q6600 boleh oc.9400 = tak higher ocing...video editing dengan quad memang mantap, 12MB memang pujaan, 8MB pon aku still leh encode + main game aku pon nak upgrade jugak ke Q9550, kumpul dana dulu, sementara i7 kuar... mesti Q9550 drop price .. go TS 9450.. jangan 9400... nanti menyesal... hahaha..p/s : apa guna vote kat atas tu, last2 ikut naluri sendiri plak Bukan apa aku dah cari sumber Q9400 compare dengan Q9450..Quad aku ambil untuk dalam 1tahun lebih ni.dan aku ni jenis suka Bukak banyak tasking dalam pc..dengar lagu sambil main game kadang2 burn cd..kadang malas nak kuar,just tekan task ke.nak menyesal pun tak guna dah bank in pun tunggu hari isnin atau selasa barang sampaiQUOTEBoth run at the same speed, only difference is 6mb cache for the 9400 vs the 12mb cache for the 9450. Been scouring the internet trying to find benchmarks which compare these two CPUs. Couldn't find any, so maybe you guys could help. For instance, if i was running both CPU's at stock speed, and I played Crysis or FC2 at a fairly high resolution, how much more fps would I get with the 9450. Would the 9400 see significant less fps? Thank you in advance.Sumber http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.as...hreadid=2244110 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hampeh 21 Report post Posted November 8, 2008 superbandung , aku baru je lepas tengok graph dia , pergh gila rajin dia review 100 cpu kat situ .Aku rasa ko dah buat pilihan yang best dah tu Jangan fikir2, tapi sayang minggu depan baru dapat . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
amnabas 0 Report post Posted November 9, 2008 e8400 the best, murah pulak tu, tak de masalah pun Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Superbandung 2 Report post Posted November 9, 2008 QUOTE(hampeh @ Nov 8 2008, 05:55 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>superbandung , aku baru je lepas tengok graph dia , pergh gila rajin dia review 100 cpu kat situ .Aku rasa ko dah buat pilihan yang best dah tu Jangan fikir2, tapi sayang minggu depan baru dapat .Ye kot,sebab dalam otak aku skarang Q9400 lebih bagus dari E4600 yang aku pakai sekarang Bandingkan 2.4GHZ,800 FSB,65nm 2mb cache dual core jauh beza tuh..Lagi pun jimat duit aku skit dari Q9450."ala Selasa atau rabu paling lewat pun barang tuh sampai Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tyrox 0 Report post Posted November 10, 2008 kalo untuk amd bajet bawah rm 300 ada x proc yang sesuai? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hampeh 21 Report post Posted November 10, 2008 banyak ada : amd X2 5600 , X2 5400 , X2 5200 , X2 5000. (semua ni bawah rm300 , harga kedai czone lowyat la ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Superbandung 2 Report post Posted November 10, 2008 Alahai MObo Aku P5N-T Deluxe kena update bios la.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
