aku 0 Report post Posted August 29, 2006 ICANN is about to renew the .org, .biz, and .info registry contractswith a HUGE loophole to allow each registry to charge differentscaled pricing on a per-domain basis and to provide each registrywith a presumptive perpetual monopoly. This means your best domainsmay very soon cost you thousands (or more) per year in renewal fees.We need your help to halt the approval of these contract proposals.Everyone who owns a domain and cares about its value should post acomment TODAY to:http://www.icann.org/announcements/announc...t-2-28jul06.htmIts easy: Just email your comments to each of the three followingemail addresses:[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]and then approve the email links they respond with.The comment period will remain open until 5:00 PM PDT, August 28,2006. THAT'S TODAY! The comments will be submitted to the ICANN Boardof Directors for the Board to consider at its meeting on September 13,2006.If Registries can set "market prices" for each .biz, .info, .orgdomain name (ie. $500 or $1 million per year for cars.org orGoogle.org etc.. ), then ICANN will have to provide Verisign the sameterms for .com and .net in 2012. ALL of your businesses could be inserious jeopardy. So we all have a vested interest in this nothappening.If you CHOOSE to remain silent the fallout will jeopardize all of ourfutures. We need your help. Please take a moment to read the commentsothers have posted, then create one of your own and mail it off.http://forum.icann.org/lists/biz-tld-agreementhttp://forum.icann.org/lists/info-tld-agreementhttp://forum.icann.org/lists/org-tld-agreementBelow are sample letters that were forwarded to us. They give somegood ideas and the consequences of staying silent. Please rememberthat the deadline is 5pm today. THANK YOU!!The Parked.com TeamSample #1To the ICANN Board,The proposed TLD Registry Renewal Contracts for .info, .biz, and .orgdomains have a seriously flawed component whereby a Registry will beable to set arbitrary rates without price caps at whatever the marketwill bear. This will create a financially devastating impact on thebusiness models of millions of domain and web site owners worldwide.The impact will be especially damaging to .org and .info domainowners and site operators who for the most part use .org and .infodomains for non-profit, charitable organizations, and educationalpurposes.Hundreds of billions of dollars have been invested into the coredomain name infrastructure of the Internet with the securedexpectation that acquiring, owning and maintaining domains wouldalways be affordable and make economic sense for a long terminvestment.To enable and facilitate a way for registry's to financially exploitand gouge the marketplace would not only be a business tragedy, butit goes against the grain of all the base principles upon which theInternet was conceived. It would certainly deter new entrepreneursfrom considering venturing onto the Net if there is no certainty whattheir site's URL location will be costing them each year they renew.And the vast multitude of current domain owners and web siteoperators would close up shop if their costs of doing businessskyrocketed on every domain they own.Even more importantly, this flaw would give an unfair economicadvantage to individuals and corporations who have substantialcapital resources who could outbid less fortunate and startupentrepreneurs with limited capital.And inevitably, there would be a tidal wave of costly and timeconsuming lawsuits and litigation that ICANN itself would have todeal with from the millions of impacted domain owners.Thus, I respectfully request that you reconsider and reconstruct thecontracts and remove this no price caps clause completely.Sample #2I wish to express my profound concern that the proposed registryagreements for .org, .biz and .info do not prohibit predatory pricerises by the registries. ICANN was entirely right to object toVerisign's SiteFinder service, and for all the right reasons, butappears not to have learned the obvious lesson: that registries canbe motivated to do things that are not in registrants' interests.Given that reality, removal of price caps is likely to result inanticompetitive practices that seriously impact internetstakeholders. I hope that you will reconsider this aspect of theagreements.Sample #3In permitting even the theoretical hiking of fees for domain namerenewals, ICANN is threatening nothing less than the democraticnature of the Internet. As an individual, I have been using a .orgdomain for some years for a political and social blog website. Therelatively low cost of renewing my domain name and hosting the siteis extremely important to me. Operating such a site now feels like anextension of my free speech rights! I am counting on you not to doanything to erode that. Thank you.Sample #4As a small business operator, with substantial goodwill invested inour domain names, I wish to express my strong opposition to thelifting of price controls. One of ICANN's core principles is theencouragement of competition at both the registry and registrarlevels. Such competition is incompatible with the kind ofunrestricted monopoly that these proposed agreements would create. Itherefore urge the board to reject the agreements.aku kurang arif perbezaan waktu antarabangsa.. rasa2nya tamat 5.00 pagi waktu Malaysia.Cara2:1. Pilih sample 1 - 4, atau karang ayat dalam bahasa Inggeris.2. Hantar ke [email protected],[email protected],[email protected]3. tunggu reply daripada ketiga-tiga email4. ikut arahan dalam email tersebut. (lebih kurang tiga step kecil disini: 1-klik link, 2-buang sedikit error pada alamat, 3-klik submit button)JIKA perkara ini diluluskan, tidak mustahil harga .com juga akan naik.putera.com ni pon mungkin bleh naik rege ntuk renew dalam ratus-ratus (aku pasti ada orang mahu )jadik.. samalah kita menyatakan bantahan.. yeeha!//halamak.. macam dah lepas tempoh.. tapi aku vote bleh lagi.. apa2pon.. cubalah, tak rugi... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites