MalaysianSecurityForce 0 Report post Posted May 17, 2004 dh pakai dah. Tp, bila hdd byk isi, dia x leh tuko. Masa kosong, bleh jek. Pelik betul. tau aku nyet PM yg problem ???? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
asklinux 1 Report post Posted May 25, 2004 assalamualaikum ...sebenarnya kelebihan ntfs adalah ianya lebih selamat ...netbanding dgn fat32kalau ko nak [biskut tawar] password ntfs lebih susah dari fat32 ....emmm ...pm selalunya tak de masalah kalau partition ko tak de problem or broken ...kalau ada dia tak boleh ubah or lain2 lagi ...so sebelum ko nak ubah ada tools kat dalam tu ko scan dulu .....ok la cari sendiri la ekkkk ...... aku budak baru belajar kalau salah tolong tunjjukkanlinux......penguin power Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sarge 1 Report post Posted May 28, 2004 betul ker system fat32 takleh baca ntfs??katekan aku pakai XP.C aku fat32.partion2 lain sume ntfs.camtu blh tak?? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
C-Fu 0 Report post Posted May 31, 2004 salah ayat la braderfat32, ntfs, etx3 adalah filesystem. kirenye satu format/cara untuk simpan fail ke harddisk ko tu. fat32 takleh bace ntfs, ntfs takleh bace fat32. yang leh bace fat ke ntfs ke ext3 ke adalah OS. win98 takleh bace ntfs, hanya leh bace dan tulis/write kat fat32. xp leh bace ntfs dan fat, leh tulis kat dedua tu. linux leh bace fat32, ntfs, ext3, dll, tapi hanya leh tulis kat fat32, ext3. ntfs linux takleh tulis, leh bace je. kalo leh tulis, then leh save data kat drive/partition tu. so leh la nak install os kat partition tu.kalo leh bace, hanya leh copy data dari partition tu dan bukak file2 dari partition tu.kalo takleh bace and tulis, partition tu die tak nampak.sume filesysmte ade kelebihan/kekurangan die sendirik. bukan takat + dan - dalam read/write je. right click file, pilih properties. yang ade tulis date access la, modified la, tu semua extra data/metadata yang filesystem tu leh simpan untuk sesatu file tu. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HanevE 1 Report post Posted June 19, 2004 fat 32 = less protection n sucurentfs = saving space , more protection (jarang berlaku bad sector), windows XP keatas je ble bace file system tuni aku dgr kat tech TV Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Power 0 Report post Posted June 19, 2004 Satu lagi nak tambah. Kalu guna FAT membazir ruang aje.Tak caye?. Cuba ko check saiz fail kemudian banding saiz dalam hard disk. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
C-Fu 0 Report post Posted June 20, 2004 gune ntfs la yang membazir ruang hdd, pasal ntfs ade simpan a lot more extra information kat harddisk berbanding fat32. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
arfaie 15 Report post Posted June 20, 2004 fat32 lebih jimat ruang then compress file better than ntfs... betul tak nie, mcm c-fu cakap tuh, tapi ntfs capaian file lebih baik... aduhai mana yg best nie Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zer0Nehza 7 Report post Posted June 22, 2004 NTFS utk OS ko (xp) partition C:fat 32 utk buat backup data kt partition lain..gituhla 2 thn aku guna...ok jerkn mmg da besh la.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
C-Fu 0 Report post Posted June 22, 2004 fat32 lebih jimat ruang then compress file better than ntfs... betul tak nie, mcm c-fu cakap tuh, tapi ntfs capaian file lebih baik... aduhai mana yg best nie ako rase ntfs yang compress lagi elok, pasal kalo fat32, die compress satu partition terus, bukan compress tiap2 fail. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MalaysianSecurityForce 0 Report post Posted July 12, 2004 fat 32 = less protection n sucurentfs = saving space , more protection (jarang berlaku bad sector), windows XP keatas je ble bace file system tuni aku dgr kat tech TV Pask "jarang berlaku bad sector" tu tipu je. patutnya "jarang berlaku lost cluster" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MalaysianSecurityForce 0 Report post Posted July 12, 2004 gune ntfs la yang membazir ruang hdd, pasal ntfs ade simpan a lot more extra information kat harddisk berbanding fat32. Sorry... nk interrupt sikit je . NTFS ada additional attribute pada FATnya, so FAT (sbnrnya FS) table akan jadik lbh besar berbanding FAT32. tapi, FAT32 mempunyai masalah internal Fragmentation/utilization berbanding NTFS, so ia akan makan lbh byk space, terutama bila makin byk bil fail.Tp, secara keseluruhannya, FAT32 adalah lbh besar drpd NTFS, kerana masalah internal fragmentation lbh kritikal drpd FAT table. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
